Aristotle of Stagira (384–322 BC)
The breadth and volume of Aristotle's writings is staggering by any standard. He wrote on philosophy, logics, politics, biology, physics, and cosmology. In his De caelo (On the Heavens), Aristotle adopted with some modifications the geocentric planetary model of Eudoxus and Callipus (ca. 370-300 BC), but ascribed physical reality to the planetary spheres. His physics relies on an essential distinction between the sublunar realm, made of the four elements earth, water, wind, and fire, and the celestial realm, made of ether (or quintessence) and deemed incorruptible. Aristotle offered the world an internally consistent physics and cosmology of hitherto uncomparable breadth and explanatory power, which was to endure for more than 1200 years. In conjunction with Ptolemy's mathematical model of planetary motions, it was to form the cornerstone of the christian medieval view of the cosmos. Aristotle argued vehemently against the pluralistic teachings of atomism. "The world must be unique," he wrote. "There cannot be several worlds." He justified this stance on a number of grounds. For example, in his Metaphysics, he explains the motion of the planets and stars (around the Earth) as due to the "Prime Mover" acting at the periphery. If there were other Earths, there would have to be a plurality of Prime Movers, an idea he rejected as philosophically and religiously unacceptable. In Aristotle's cosmology, the Earth was located at the center of a nested system of crystalline spheres to which were attached the Moon, Sun, planets, and stars. According to his doctrine of "natural motion and place", the four basic elements of earth, air, fire, and water tended to move to their rightful positions with respect to the Earth. Fire moved naturally outward, earth moved naturally inward to the center, while air and water assumed intermediate stations. This fundamental tenet underlay Aristotle's belief in a single kosmos, or world system, with the Earth at its focus. If there were more than one world, the elements of fire and earth would have no unique natural place to which to move – for him, a physical and logical contradiction. Aristotle maintained that there was a clear distinction between the terrestrial and celestial regions. The latter knew neither life nor death and the bodies within it were composed not of Earthly matter but of a fifth element, or quintessence. It was the innermost sphere, carrying the Moon, he believed, that marked the boundary between the impermanent "sublunary" realm of the Earth and the unchanging "superlunary" domain of the heavens. (See also ancient philosophy, related to the possibility of extraterrestrial life.) Following its transmission to the West in the 12th century, Aristotle's doctrine of a one-world, geocentric cosmos was appropriated by the Church and largely upheld as being in keeping with the Christian belief in a special relationship between God and Man. However, it did not go unquestioned by medieval theologians, particularly as its insistence that there could be only one world appeared to put constraints on God's power. Between the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, university scholars, including Jean Buridan, William of Ockham, and Nicole Oresme, gradually reformulated the Aristotelian dictum of natural place so that an omnipotent God would at least have had the logical option to create other worlds. Having said this, almost all medieval Scholastics held to the view that God had in reality created only one world. Extraterrestrials were restricted to spiritual beings like demons, ethereal in their make-up, which, it was supposed, lived in the "middle region", between heaven and Earth. Only following the Copernican Revolution and the overthrow of Aristotle's geocentric cosmology, could the idea of other worlds and other life made of ordinary matter finally take hold. Related entry • Greek astronomy Related categories PHILOSOPHY • PHYSICISTS • ASTRONOMERS AND ASTROPHYSICISTS Source: High Altitude Observatory Also on this site: Encyclopedia of Alternative Energy & Sustainable Living Encyclopedia of History Transport Concepts & Designs (partner site) |